Legal Opinion

Bacher v. Patencio

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 12, 1964No. 64-515PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, District Judge.

Since this case involves a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the substantive facts stated herein are only those pleaded in the complaint.

On April 17, 1964, William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Raymond Baddour, and Milton Goldman, plaintiffs, filed this action for specific performance and damages against Joseph Patrick Pateneio and Clarence A. Brechlin (sometimes hereafter referred to as defendants).

Pateneio is an American Indian, who is a duly enrolled member of the Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians. Brechlin is the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. McKay v. KalytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Nellie Atkins Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Udall v. TaunahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Edwin E. Lawrence, Carolee Lawrence v. United States of America, United States of America, as Trustee, Flora Cruz, Austin CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Palm Springs Paint Co. v. ArenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API