Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 2000No. 1079-99PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, J.,

delivered a concurring opinion,

in which McCORMICK, P.J., and MEYERS and KEASLER, J.J., joined.

I write separately to emphasize my displeasure with the actions taken by the trial court here. I cannot condone its act of *637dismissing the jury and sitting as fact-finder for the punishment evidence. When a defendant pleads guilty in front of a jury, the trial is not bifurcated, but rather is a unitary trial asking that the fact-finder determine punishment only — not guilt. See Carroll v. State, 975 S.W.2d 630, 631-32 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). Trial courts should not attempt to circumvent the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mau v. Third Court of Appeals (In Re State)Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. State v. Waller, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. CUARENTA, ANTHONY LUKE v. the State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2025
  4. The State of Texas v. Anthony Luke Cuarenta, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2024
  5. in Re State of Texas Ex Rel, Tharp, JenniferCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API