Legal Opinion

Whitley v. New Mexico Children, Youth & Families Department

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 26, 2001No. CIV.00-1101-LCSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendant Deborah Hartz, Karen Za-rate, Susan W. Drake, Cecilia Rosales and Children Youth and Families Depart-*1149merit’s (hereinafter “Governmental Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 82), filed June 5, 2001. The United States Magistrate Judge, acting upon consent and designation pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and having considered the pleadings, submissions, arguments of counsel, relevant law, and being otherwise fully advised, finds that this Motion is well-taken and should be…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whitley v. NEW MEXICO CHILDREN, YOUTH & FAMILIESDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API