Legal Opinion
Temples v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided November 16, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCroaynover, J.
This was a suit by Pete U. Temples against the Prudential Insurance Company of America to recover on a group insurance policy, the master policy having been issued and delivered to his employer, the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, at Nashville, and the certificate on same having been issued to him providing for the payment of $2,000 for total and permanent disability; it having been alleged in the bill that the insured had become totally and permanently disabled by reason of accident and illness while this policy was in force. And he further sought to recover 25 per cent statutory…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Pacific Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. McCraryTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Wall v. Continental Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Horn's Administrator v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wright v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Supreme Liberty L. Ins. Co. v. PemeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of U. S. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
- Shane v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.