Legal Opinion

Hinebaugh v. McRae

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2011No. DA 11-0240PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶ 1 Loren and Mary Hinebauch and Good Things, LLC (Hinebauchs), appeal from the order of the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Custer County, Montana, granting Douglas and Kim McRae’s (McRaes) motion for summary judgment. The Hinebauchs allege the District Court erred in determining disputed issues of material fact regarding their breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims, and in determining that the Hinebauchs had unclean hands, thus barring their unjust enrichment claim.

¶2 We affirm the result on different grounds.

ISSUES

¶3 The Hinebauchs raise three issues on appeal. A restatement of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wells Fargo Bank v. TalmageMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sprunk v. First Bank SystemMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Roseneau Foods, Inc. v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Great Falls Water Works Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Roman Catholic ChurchMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Morrow v. Bank of America, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kichnet v. Butte-Silver Bow CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Welu v. Twin Hearts Smiling Horses, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API