Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Appeals of CIG Field Services Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 3, 2005No. 92,655Published

1DissentDavis, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority decision and conclude that the Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) had no jurisdiction to make findings of fact regarding the constitutionality of K.S.A. 79-5a01.

BOTA is a specialized agency that exists to decide taxation issues. While assessment is a question of taxation, discriminatory assessment is not a tax question but rather a constitutional question. BOTA does not have the authority to decide the constitutionality of a statute. Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, Syl. ¶ 3, 826 P.2d 1365, cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).

There was no disagreement between the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. In Re Tax Application of Lietz Constr. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Zarda v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. In Re Tax Appeal of ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. In Re Tax Appeal of Alsop Sand Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API