Legal Opinion

Citizens' Securities Co. v. Hammel

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1910No. Civ. No. 857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles county, and from an order denying a new trial.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff, the owner of a building in Los Angeles, leased the same to a corporation known as the Ocean View Cemetery Company; that prior to the 21st of October, 1908, the cemetery company was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $395.50 on account of rent of said premises; that before said twenty-first day of October, as security for such unpaid rent, the cemetery company delivered to plaintiff possession of the office furniture contained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thornburgh v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Hitchcock v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Darville v. MayhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. American National Bank v. Wheeler-Adams Auto Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Barnsdall Nat. Bank v. DykesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  5. Scott v. Los Angeles Mountain Park Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API