Legal Opinion

Croley v. De Witt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1968No. 32789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. CLOYD, Special Judge.

Defendants-Appellants hereinafter referred to as defendants appeal from an order whereby defendants are permanently enjoined from permitting a dam or levee or any other type of obstruction to remain in and across a natural drainway. Defendants, their agents or servants were given five days to comply with the order.

Defendants contend that, plaintiffs’ petition failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and secondly, that plaintiffs failed in their burden of proof, in failing to show that there was a natural watercourse and that defendants failed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Niehaus v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Dowdy v. Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. City of Bowling Green v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Skaggs v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Dudley Special Road District v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Hirsch v. SteffenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Dodge v. MillardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Viessman v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API