Croley v. De Witt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE W. CLOYD, Special Judge.
Defendants-Appellants hereinafter referred to as defendants appeal from an order whereby defendants are permanently enjoined from permitting a dam or levee or any other type of obstruction to remain in and across a natural drainway. Defendants, their agents or servants were given five days to comply with the order.
Defendants contend that, plaintiffs’ petition failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and secondly, that plaintiffs failed in their burden of proof, in failing to show that there was a natural watercourse and that defendants failed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Niehaus v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Dowdy v. Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- City of Bowling Green v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Skaggs v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Dudley Special Road District v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hirsch v. SteffenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Dodge v. MillardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Viessman v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992