Legal Opinion

Viessman v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1992No. 17502PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Judge.

Dorothy Viessman (plaintiff) brought an action against Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) for personal injuries that she allegedly sustained in an automobile accident. Plaintiff’s claims were in two counts that sought recovery based upon uninsured motorist coverage included in an automobile insurance policy that Allstate had issued. Allstate filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The trial court granted the motion. This court reverses and remands.

In considering whether a petition has stated a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Halpin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Kisling v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Rister Ex Rel. Rister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eaton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. ROY L. WISE v. BRENT R. THORNHILL, and SAVERS PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Defendant-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API