Legal Opinion
Hartridge v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 2006No. 97-CF-1867, 97-CF-2028, 98-CF-153Published
1Opinion of the Court
896 A.2d 198 (2006)
Thadduse Lee HARTRIDGE, James Thomas Cullison & Mark A. Ford, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 97-CF-1867, 97-CF-2028, 98-CF-153.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued February 3, 2004.
Decided March 23, 2006.
Richard K. Gilbert, appointed by the court, for appellant Hartridge.
Annie R. Alexander, appointed by the court, for appellant Cullison.
Joshua D. Greenberg, Washington, with whom Robert A. Long, Jr. and Bruce A. Baird were on the brief, for appellant Ford.
Margaret Chriss, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., United States…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.