Legal Opinion

Sledge v. . Elliott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 15 opinions

AotioN to recover possession of a lot in tbe town of Marion, beard before Shuford, J., at Spring Term, 1894, of McDowell Superior Court. From a'judgment for tbe plaintiff the defendants appealed. Tbe facts appear in the •opinion of Associate Justice Aveey.

1Opinion of the Court

Aveky, J.:

Tbe right of tbe plaintiff to recover in tbe action for title and possession of a lot was made to depend upon tbe question whether a record of an administrator’s petition for sale for assets with tbe decree and sale under which tbe plaintiffs'claimed title were open to attack and were shown to be invalid and subject to collateral impeachment by tbe heirs-at-law of tbe decedent.

Tbe petition was filed in tbe Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions of McDowell County, at the Fall Term, 1864, in accordance with tbe provisions of Revised Code, Ob. 46, Sec. 47, et seg and not under tbe Act of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Sumner v. . SessomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Fowler v. . PoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Hare v. . HollomonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Syme v. . TriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rackley v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Nathan v. Charlotte Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Moore v. . WinfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Chrisco v. . YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API