Legal Opinion
State v. Daniel F.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the order of Supreme Court reinstated.
In this Mental Hygiene Law article 10 proceeding, Supreme Court, after a bench trial, found that respondent is not a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 10.11 (d), and ordered his discharge from confinement subject to a regimen of strict and intensive supervision. The Appellate Division reversed concluding that respondent is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement (77 AD3d 1400 [4th Dept 2010]).
In a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Sheila G.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. FlaggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rocky Point Drive-In, L.P. v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Gabriela A.New York Court of Appeals · 2014