Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gwinn v. Bucklin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1914No. 11807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, French, J., entered October 23, 1913, dismissing mandamus proceedings, after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker., J.

The relators, W. L. Gwinn and R. L. Thomas, stockholders of the Kitsap Title Abstract Company, seek, by mandamus proceedings, to compel the respondents, R. E. Bucklin and E. A. Landolt, the president and secretary respectively of that company, to permit the relators to examine the books and records of the company. Upon a hearing had in the superior court, judgment was rendered denying the relief prayed for and dismissing the action. From this ruling and judgment, relators have appealed to this court.

The Kitsap Title Abstract Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foster v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Johnson v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Weihenmayer v. BitnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Kimball v. DernUtah Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Paschall v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State ex rel. Beaty v. Guarantee Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State Ex Rel. Lee v. Goldsmith Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Farrier v. Ritzville Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. Herman v. GoodsellWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API