Becker v. Brooklyn Edison Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtBogenshutz, J.
Plaintiff sues to recover the sum of $121.10 alleged to have been wrongfully exacted by defendant. Defendant, a transportation corporation, denies plaintiff’s right to a return of the money, contending that it demanded and received it in payment of a just claim; that it was a voluntary payment. As authority for his right to recover plaintiff invokes the rule that “ when a party is compelled by duress of his person or goods to pajr money for which he is not liable it is not voluntary but compulsory and may be recovered.” Harmony v. Bingham, 12 N. Y. 99, 116. Defendant contends the situation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harmony v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Apex Leasing Co. v. LitkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Tismer v. . New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- The New-York and Harlem Railroad Co. v. . MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Apex Leasing Company v. . LitkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FIRST FED SAV & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF TWIN FALLS v. East End Mut. Elec. Co., Ltd.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987