Legal Opinion
Uddin v. Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 11, 2025No. 3:24-cv-02532Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 SALAH UDDIN, Case No. 24-cv-02532-WHO 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 8 v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS 9 AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI AMERICA, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 67, 68, 69 10 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff Salah Uddin is suing several entities involved in the purchase and servicing of a 13 2020 Lamborghini Aventador (the “Vehicle”), alleging that some or all of them violated the Truth 14 in Mileage Act (“TIMA”), 49 U.S.C. § 32701, et seq., breached express and implied warranties 15 that accompanied the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.