Amankwa v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered November 21, 1994, which denied defendant’s motion to renew its summary judgment motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
*263Since defendant’s "renewal” motion was, in essence, a motion for "reargument”, the order denying the motion is not appealable (Oppenheimer & Co. v Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., 173 AD2d 203, 204). Defendant’s "renewal” motion was based on citation of recent cases that merely reaffirmed existing law and thus, did not constitute new "law not previously considered” by the IAS Court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Johnston v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (Amtrak)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lichtman v. Mount Judah CemeteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Macias v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Feinman v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Fintzi v. Riverdale Riding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Chen v. NassimiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997