Fambro v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant’s motion for a rehearing is merely concerned with two propositions urged by him wherein it is claimed we were in error.

The proposition relative to a charge on the defense of property is again urged, and error is claimed because of the court’s failure to charge thereon. We adhere to the reasoning set forth hereon in the original opinion, and see no benefit that could come from an elaboration thereof. See Fambro v. State, 139 Texas Cr. R. 480, 141 S. W. (2d) 354.

Again it is insisted that the trial court was in error in failing and refusing to…