Davis v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
McCLOUD, Chief Justice.
The jury found Harold Charles Davis, II, guilty of retaliation. Appellant pleaded true to both enhancement paragraphs, and the jury assessed punishment at confinement for 99 years. We affirm.
In his first two points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. In deciding a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Miniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Lockhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Sewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Helleson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Wiggins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Wilkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
- Coward v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- In re M.M.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.