Legal Opinion

Gombar v. Schaeffer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1963No. Appeal, 202PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The plaintiff sued Kenneth Schaeffer for assault and battery and the appellee Home Association for negligence in failing to protect him, as its patron, from the assault. The jury found against both defendants “each to pay the sum of $2500, a total of $5,000 compensation”. While Schaeffer took no action after the jury’s verdict, the association’s motion for a new trial was granted by the court en banc. The plaintiff has taken an appeal from this action.

Although the grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by us if anything appears in the record sufficient to justify it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Mozino v. CanusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Breisch v. LeitzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Newman v. ShreveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. John Tromza v. Tecumseh Products Company, a Corporation and Marquette Corporation, a Corporation. Marquette CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Warren v. Mosites Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Furey v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Prather v. H-K Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API