Legal Opinion

Mississippi Paint & Varnish Co. v. Clayborne

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1932No. 30230Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cook, J.,

deliyered the opinion of the court.

A salesman of the appellant secured from the appellee an order for roofing cement. This order was in writing, signed by the appellee, and, under the heading, “Conditions of Sale,” contained the following stipulations: “This order subject to approval of Home Office. We are manufacturers exclusively and no contracts for the application of our products are authorized by us. This order is not subject to countermand unless so specified on order. This order is not sold on consignment or approval. No agreements recognized unless incorporated, in writing on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. B. Colt Co. v. OdomMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brenard Mfg. Co. v. SumrallMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Stevens v. StanleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Bettman-Dunlap Co. v. Gertz Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API