Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Stanley

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1929No. 27821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The appellant, plaintiff in the court below, filed suit upon certain promissory notes executed by the appellee, E. A. Stanley, to .the Brenard Manufacturing Company and payable to its order. The defense of the appellee was that the notes were fraudulently procured by the agent of the Brenard Manufacturing Company by making false representations as to the transaction involved for which the notes were given. The appellee also pleaded the general issue, and a special plea alleging that the appellant was not a purchaser of said notes for value without notice, but that he was aware of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. B. Colt Co. v. OdomMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brenard Mfg. Co. v. SumrallMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bettman-Dunlap Co. v. Gertz Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Brenard Mfg. Co. v. LittleMississippi Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perrault v. White Sewing MacH. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Misso v. National Bank of CommerceMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  3. White v. StewartMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Mississippi Paint & Varnish Co. v. ClayborneMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Natchez Pecan Marketing Ass'n v. BramlettMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API