McGowan v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from a judgment entered by the Superior Court (Washington County, Atwood, J.) granting Randy McGowan’s amended petition for post-conviction relief on two of seventeen alleged grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. The State contends that the court erred in concluding that McGowan’s trial counsel’s cross-examination of a State witness and his failure to secure the testimony of a blood spatter expert witness both constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we agree with the State’s contentions, we vacate the judgment and remand for entry of an order…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lang v. MurchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. SylvainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Pineo v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Daniel P. Roberts v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Alexandre v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Fortune v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Francis v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.