Legal Opinion

Pineo v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 23, 2006No. Docket: Cum-05-363PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Robert Pineo appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Warren, J.) denying his amended petition for post-conviction review based on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. 1 Pineo contends that the post-conviction court applied the wrong standards in determining whether he was provided effective assistance of counsel at his trial. Pineo also argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his defense attorney made unreasonable strategic choices without his consent, including the attorney’s concession to the jury during his opening…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. State v. AnayaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mark J. Theriault v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. Heon v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Fortune v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Francis v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. In re Children of Jeremy A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API