Legal Opinion

Hanjo Contractors v. Wick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about December 18, 1988, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff does not dispute that it did not have the home improvement license required by law when it performed the work on which this action was based. (Administrative Code of City of New York § 20-387 [a].) Strict compliance with the licensing requirement is mandatory. (Millington v Rapoport, 98 AD2d 765, 766.) Where the contractor was not licensed when the work was done, it cannot…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Millington v. RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Hammerman v. Jamco Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Ivy Walk Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. B & L Auto Group, Inc. v. ZeligCivil Court of the City of New York · 2001
  3. Nemard Construction Corp. v. DeafeamkporNew York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API