Commonwealth v. Olaf O.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant, a juvenile fifteen years of age who became sixteen during the period of the charged offenses, raises on appeal several issues arising from his adjudications of delinquency by reason of statutory rape (one count) and indecent assault and battery upon a child under the age of fourteen (two counts).
1. Jury of six. The juvenile argues that he was constitutionally entitled to be tried by a jury of twelve, rather than the six called for by G. L. c. 119, § 56, because the adjudication will cause his name to be listed in the sex offender registry established by G. L. c. 6, §§…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MahnkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GrandisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MeehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weitz v. CollinsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
- Colson v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- Moe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019