Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kern, Leila R., J.
The plaintiff brings this action pursuant to G.L.c. 30A, §14 and G.L.c. 6, §178M seeking review of the decision by the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB or Board) requiring him to register as a Level Three sex offender. After careful review of the proceedings and the record, the decision of the Board is affirmed. The Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED and the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is ALLOWED.
BACKGROUND
I. SORB Statutes and Regulations
The Board is an administrative agency constituted under the laws of the Commonwealth of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- DutilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.