Legal Opinion
IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY HIRING PRACTICES DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 13, 2023No. 3:22-cv-05173Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 7 HIRING PRACTICES DERIVATIVE Case No. 22-cv-05173-TLT LITIGATION 8 All Related Actions 9 ASBESTOS WORKERS PHILADELPHIA 10 WELFARE AND PENSION FUND, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01168-TLT Plaintiffs, 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. INTERVENE; GRANTING LEAVE TO 12 FILE MOTION; RELATING CASE 13 CHARLES W. SCHARF, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 38, 55 Defendants. 14 Pending before the Court is Amy Cook’s (“Cook”) motion to intervene and to stay action 15 and Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.