Dupay v. Dupay
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Matthew A. Dupay appeals from an amended judgment denying in major part his motion to modify his child support obligation. We conclude the district court did not err in refusing to relieve Dupay of his obligation to pay child support to Greta J. Dupay, now known as Greta J. Powell (“Powell”), based on proceeds he received from a personal injury settlement in 2002. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Dupay and Powell were divorced in June 2002. Powell was granted primary custody 1 for the couple’s child, and Dupay was ordered to pay $298 per month in child support. In April 2005, Powell…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Schwalk v. AbfalterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Toppenberg v. ToppenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. TiborNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Fredrickson v. ButtonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.