Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott v. New England Mutual Life Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1935No. 28774Published

1DissentPaine, J.

Two opinions have been heretofore adopted by a majority of the court in this case. The writer of this dissent respectfully dissents from this third opinion. The first is found in 126 Neb. 514, and the second in 127 Neb. 724. Each of these opinions reversed the judgment of the *876trial court on the ground that untrue answers, if proved to be knowingly made by the insured, would avoid the contract.

What will be the effect of this third opinion just adopted? If this insured was 24 years of age at the time of trial in 1931, and if his expectancy was 39 years, as shown in the mortality table in our…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Sindelar v. T. B. Hord Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lebs v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Brown v. Swift & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API