Pietramale v. Dugay
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs in this action are the Pie-tramales, a husband and wife who purchased a home not knowing that it had termite damage. They appeal from summary judgments granted in favor of Hunt-land Realty Co., the sellers’ agent, and Simmons Pest Control Co., the firni that inspected the home for termites.
When the Pietramales purchased a home from the Dugays, the parties executed a sales contract which contained the following provision: “Property to be inspected by licensed and bonded termite company and any active infestation or damage to be corrected at Seller’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tartera v. PalumboTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
- Poore v. Magnavox Co. of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ritter v. Custom Chemicides, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Gibb v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Patton v. McHoneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Stamp v. Honest Abe Log Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Hosford v. McKissackMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.