Loanes v. Gast
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is an action of tort brought by a mortgagee of personal property against a constable who had attached it upon a writ against a third person. The plaintiff’s right to maintain his action depends upon the sufficiency of a notice given by him to the defendant in these words: “You having attached on mesne process . . . [certain chattels] as the property of James Loanes, I hereby give you notice that I am the holder of a mortgage on said property and I hereby demand that you pay the amount of said mortgage, to wit, the sum of One hundred and fifty dollars. Said mortgage is dated October…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Wilson v. CrookerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Ashcroft v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Cousins v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Campbell v. EastmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
3Cited by61 opinions
- Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Adamaitis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Vigeant v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Elliott v. Warwick Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.