Legal Opinion

Loanes v. Gast

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1913PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action of tort brought by a mortgagee of personal property against a constable who had attached it upon a writ against a third person. The plaintiff’s right to maintain his action depends upon the sufficiency of a notice given by him to the defendant in these words: “You having attached on mesne process . . . [certain chattels] as the property of James Loanes, I hereby give you notice that I am the holder of a mortgage on said property and I hereby demand that you pay the amount of said mortgage, to wit, the sum of One hundred and fifty dollars. Said mortgage is dated October…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Wilson v. CrookerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Ashcroft v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Cousins v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Campbell v. EastmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Adamaitis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Vigeant v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Elliott v. Warwick Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API