Legal Opinion

Joseph T. Miller Construction Co. v. Borak

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 22, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEBRING and ROBERTS, Justices.

We here consider two motions filed in this appeal by the appellees, defendants below: (1) a motion to strike certain parts of the record on appeal, and (2) a motion to affirm the judgment appealed from, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 38, 30 F.S.A.

The appeal to which such motions are directed was taken from an order of the lower court dismissing plaintiff’s action, at law, for damages for breach of a restrictive covenant in a deed, for failure to state a cause of action. The plaintiff had previously attempted to obtain equitable relief by way of a mandatory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Holland v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
  3. Hunter v. TynerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Wilensky v. PerellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Walker v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Versen v. VersenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Allett v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Bolick v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Morris v. RabaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Cooksey v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API