Legal Opinion
Wilensky v. Perell
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 27, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
72 So.2d 278 (1954)
WILENSKY
v.
PERELL.
Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.
April 27, 1954.
Nichols, Gaither, Green, Frates & Beckham and Wm. Clinton Green, Miami, for appellant.
Dixon, DeJarnette & Bradford, Miami, for appellee.
THOMAS, Justice.
The court dismissed an original and two amended complaints. The order dismissing the second amended complaint contained no provision for further amendment. Then the appellee employed additional counsel and they petitioned for a rehearing and submitted a third amended complaint. The rehearing was granted and evidently the new complaint was thoroughly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Butler v. ManeySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Town of Coreytown v. State Ex Rel. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- McCullough v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
3Cited by8 opinions
- Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Mansur v. EubanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- WELLS FARGO ARM. SERVS. CORP. v. Sunshine SEC. and Detective Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Joseph T. Miller Construction Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- American Ladder & Scaffold Co. v. Miami Ventilated Awning Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.