Big City Dynasty Corp v. FP Holdings, L.P.

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 BIG CITY DYNASTY, et al., Case No.: 2:19-cv-02078-APG-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10 v. [Docket No. 38] 11 FP HOLDINGS, L.P., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is the motion by Defendant FP Holdings (“the Palms”) to compel 14 discovery and for an award of expenses. Docket No. 38.1 Plaintiffs Big City Dynasty and Ryan 15 Raddon (collectively, “Kaskade”) filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 40.2 The Palms filed 16 a reply. Docket No. 41. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78- 17 1. For…