Scott v. Cook
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : Putnam v. Ross,. 46 Mo. 337 ; De Witt v. Smith, 63 Mo. 263; Garnett v. Berry, 3 Mo. App. 197 ; Fitzgerald v. Thomas, 61 Mo. 499 ; Cantwell v. Massman, 45 Mo. 103 ; Livermore v„ Wright, 33 Mo. 31; Peck v. Richardson, 2 Mo. App. 600. cited: Lutz v. Ey, 3 Abb. Pr. 475 ; Thompson v. Yates, 28 How. Pr. 142 £ Henly v. Wadsworth, 38 Cal. 356 ; Garnett v. Berry, 3 Mo. App. 197 ; Peck v. Richardson, 2 Mo. App. 600.
1Opinion of the Court
Bakewéll, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This action is oh a mechanic’s lien for painting and glazing four houses belonging to defendants I. and J. Meyer,, defendant Cook being the contractor. The claim is for a balance due upon one single charge, for doing all the painting and glazing upon these four houses, at the contract, price of $1,200, of which $430 has been paid, leaving due-$770.
It appears from the evidence that Cook was under contract with the owners to complete the houses by the 1st of November, at the price of $21,800. The houses were to be-, inspected and accepted by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Garnett v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by7 opinions
- Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DriesselIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Schwartz Bros. CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Darlington Lumber Co. v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Avery v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Cole v. BarronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.