Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Birdwell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1999No. 73653PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.

in which McCORMICK, P.J., MANSFIELD, KELLER, PRICE, HOLLAND, and KEASLER, JJ., joined.

One issue in this case is whether a defendant may waive the right not to be twice placed in jeopardy for the same offense. We hold that the defendant may waive the right. We are also called upon *161the reconsider the correctness of a statement in Ex parte Wilson v. State,, 562 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1978).

I

In 1978 the applicant waived trials by jury and pleaded guilty to two indictments charging offenses of forgery. He was convicted of both offenses and sentenced to three years’ confinement. The sentences began…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ex Parte BigelowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Ex Parte BauderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Minix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  2. Ex Parte BirdwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Ex Parte Jose C. Loredo, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Ex Parte Jose C. Loredo, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Ex parte EstradaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API