Legal Opinion
DUNCAN v. CITY OF STROUD
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 6, 2015No. 112,172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge.
{ 1 Donald W. Duncan appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his petition alleging a tort claim against the City of Stroud. The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36, 12 O.S. Supp.2013, ch. 15, app. 1, and the matter stands submitted without appellate briefing. In the district court, the City argued that Duncan failed to file this suit within the applicable limitations period required by the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 0.8.2011 §§ 151-172 (GTCA), and therefore, his claim was barred. 1 The City's…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Reirdon v. Wilburton Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- HALL v. THE GEO GROUP, INCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Gens v. Casady SchoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford v. Tulsa Public SchoolsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- ALBURTUS v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1 OF TULSA COUNTYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- DUNCAN v. CITY OF STROUDCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Hill v. State ex rel. Board of RegentsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Osterhout v. MorganDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2019