Legal Opinion

Louis Friedman Realty Co. v. De Stefan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

Plaintiff leased to defendant vacant property to be used as a gasoline station and garage. The property, according to the facts stipulated, was in a district restricted by the zoning ordinance to business and thus closed to the erection of garages intended for more than five cars without permission of the board of standards and appeals, in accordance with the provisions of the ordinance (Zoning Ordinance, § 21; Id. § 4, item 15.) The lease contained a covenant that the tenant should “ secure the necessary permits from the municipal and State authorities and shall comply with all the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raner v. GoldbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Louis Friedman Realty Co. v. De StefanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stockburger v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Warshawsky v. American Automotive Products Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. Say-Phil Realty Corp. v. de LignemareNew York City Court · 1928
  4. Clements v. SteinhauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. Jobco-Mitchel Field, Inc. v. LazarusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API