Legal Opinion

McMillan v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Claimant, an inmate at a State correctional facility, commenced this action to recover damages for allegedly wrongful confinement in a special housing unit following his refusal to accept a work assignment. The only issue we need consider on this appeal is claimant’s argument that he is entitled to recover damages on a common-law tort theory of false imprisonment or wrongful excessive confinement because he was confined in a special housing unit in violation of the State’s own regulations (cf., Arteaga v…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boles v. Dormer Giant, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Trendell v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Ackerman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Bezio v. DorseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API