McMillan v. State
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Claimant, an inmate at a State correctional facility, commenced this action to recover damages for allegedly wrongful confinement in a special housing unit following his refusal to accept a work assignment. The only issue we need consider on this appeal is claimant’s argument that he is entitled to recover damages on a common-law tort theory of false imprisonment or wrongful excessive confinement because he was confined in a special housing unit in violation of the State’s own regulations (cf., Arteaga v…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boles v. Dormer Giant, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Trendell v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ackerman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Bezio v. DorseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2013