Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ackerman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1994Published

1Dissent

Sullivan, J. P., and Kupferman, J.,

dissent in part in a

memorandum by Sullivan, J. P., as follows: Since I believe that there is no basis for the assertion of a fraud claim or the recovery of punitive damages, I would affirm the dismissal of the fraud cause of action and modify the order appealed from to strike the claim for punitive damages, as does the majority, but without leave to replead as to either disposition.

Plaintiffs contend that the defendant insurer Metropolitan falsely represented that claims for medical services would be judged under "generally accepted medical standards.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Miller v. Volk & Huxley, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Samovar of Russia Jewelry Antique Corp. v. GeneraliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Brown v. WeinrebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Fleming v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API