Legal Opinion

Kenny v. DiCenso

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 16, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, who seek to recover a broker’s commission in connection with the sale of the defendants’ real estate, claim to be aggrieved by the direction of verdicts for the defendants. It was error to direct the verdicts.

We apply the settled rule that a verdict should not be directed if “anywhere in the evidence, from whatever source derived, any combination of *836circumstances could be found from which a reasonable inference could be drawn in favor of the plaintiff.” Raunela v. Hertz Corp., 361 Mass. 341, 343 (1972). There was evidence that the plaintiffs’ production of the buyer, as a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Holton v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Soares v. Lakeville Baseball Camp, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Creed v. ApogMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Sherman v. Briggs Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bonin v. Chestnut Hill Towers Realty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Madden v. Malmart Mortgage Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Stein v. Chalet Susse International, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Benn v. Halyard Realty Trust (In Re Halyard Realty Trust)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
  5. Armstrong v. StoneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API