Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hake v. Burke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner argues his two sentences for the purpose of determining good time or the amount of the diminution of sentence under sec. 53.11 (3), Stats., should be regarded as one continuous sentence and if so treated as a single fifteen-year maximum sentence with the loss of one month and one day good time, his conditional release date would have been March 9, 1963. The respondent contends the seven-year and eight-year terms are to be treated as separate terms and the petitioner’s tentative conditional release date is June 9, 1964, and if the seven-year and eight-year terms are treated as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Guthmann v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State Ex Rel. Gegenfurtner v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Darst v. Forney, SheriffIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. French v. BancroftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1840

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fuentes v. Wisconsin Court of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Haas v. McReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Mueller v. PowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. O'Connor v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API