Legal Opinion

State v. Strutton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1988No. 10902PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Willard Strutton, appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, with prejudice. Strutton contends that in his petition for relief he alleged that his guilty plea was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel with sufficient particularity to entitle him to a hearing. We agree. Accordingly, the dismissal of Stratton’s petition for post-conviction relief will be reversed, and this cause will be remanded for a hearing on the merits.

I

Strutton was charged with eight counts of rape, and four counts of gross sexual imposition (the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. PeterseimOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. KapperOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Richard Dean Holtan v. Robert Parratt, Warden of Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API