Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Alan Andersen v. Sohit Khanna and Iowa Heart Center

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 2018No. 14-1682Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WATERMAN, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I respectfully dissent from parts IV and VI of the majority opinion. I would affirm the district court's summary judgment dismissing the informed-consent claim based on Dr. Khanna's failure to disclose his lack of experience with the Bentall heart procedure. Informed consent is not an open-ended, unlimited theory of liability. Rather, if a physician fails to disclose a known material risk and the risk occurs , the patient can recover for the harm resulting from the risk. But if the physician fails to disclose a risk that never…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Carolan v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Scott v. BradfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. LaCaze v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API