Legal Opinion

Rohe v. Bertine, Hufnagel, Headley, Zeltner, Drummon & Dohn, LLP

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 1, 2016No. 14-cv-9641 (KBF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge:

In this case, plaintiffs Edward and Georgette Rohe seek damages against an attorney, Peter Zeltner, and his law firm, Bertine, Hufnagel, Headley, Zeltner, Drummond & Dohn, LLP. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiffs allege that defendants committed professional malpractice and breached a fiduciary duty they owed plaintiffs in connection with a number of trusts of which plaintiffs were the beneficiaries and separate entities affiliated with those trusts.

Now before the Court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment, either in part or in full, and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allegrino v. Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  2. Esposito v. GaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. Yossef Kahlon v. Erica ItzhakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API