Courtney v. Charles Dowd Box Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
The plaintiffs, who are members of the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, and its Local 5158, both individually and on behalf of all the members, bring this bill in equity to enforce a collective bargaining-agreement with the defendant. The defendant filed a demurrer to the bill and a “motion to dismiss” for want of jurisdiction, and appealed from interlocutory decrees overruling the demurrer and denying the motion to dismiss. The ease was referred to a master. The defendant raises questions relating to the master, the hearings before him, and his reports. The final decree declared the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- General Building Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 542Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- DuBois v. PowdrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Morceau v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Republic Floors of New England, Inc. v. Weston Racquet Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.