Legal Opinion

Courtney v. Charles Dowd Box Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 7, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

The plaintiffs, who are members of the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, and its Local 5158, both individually and on behalf of all the members, bring this bill in equity to enforce a collective bargaining-agreement with the defendant. The defendant filed a demurrer to the bill and a “motion to dismiss” for want of jurisdiction, and appealed from interlocutory decrees overruling the demurrer and denying the motion to dismiss. The ease was referred to a master. The defendant raises questions relating to the master, the hearings before him, and his reports. The final decree declared the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. General Building Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 542Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. DuBois v. PowdrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Morceau v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Republic Floors of New England, Inc. v. Weston Racquet Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API