Legal Opinion

Eble v. Peluso

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1947No. Civ. 15600PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Prom a judgment in favor of defendants predicated upon the granting of their motion for a nonsuit in an action to recover damages for malpractice, plaintiff appeals.

So far as material here these are the essential facts:

On September 16, 1941, plaintiff while working as a linoleum layer tripped and fell fracturing the ring finger on his left hand. He was taken to a doctor who placed the injured member in a splint where it remained for two or three weeks. Five or six days thereafter the same doctor put a cast on the hand. The splint was retained on the injured finger but the noninjured fingers…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. HawesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bloch v. American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Frick v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Scandell v. Columbia Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Jones v. Britt Airways, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. People v. DawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API