Legal Opinion

Royal Trust Co. of Chicago v. Exchange Bank of Cortland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1898No. 8078PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

March 13, 1894, the plaintiff in error instituted an action in the county court of Lancaster county against defendants in error to recover the sum of $823.26 alleged to be its due from them. Summonses were issued and served, returnable at the nest term of the court; and on a day of such term, the parties having been served and not appearing, a judgment by default ivas entered against them. This was done of date April 11. With reference to the occurrences thereafter, we will quote from the transcript of the county court record:

“April 18, 1894. On motion of the defendants, and confession of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. WatermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hansen v. BergquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. School District Number Forty-Nine v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Berger v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anania v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lee v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kyd v. Exchange BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. National Supply Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. In Re Rabie's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API