Legal Opinion

Kyd v. Exchange Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1898No. 8347PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This action arises largely out of the same state of facts as the Royal Trust Co. v. Exchange Bank of Cortland, 55 Neb. 663. The Royal Trust Company secured a judgment against the Exchange Bank in the county court of Lancaster county. An effort was made to vacate the judgment under section 1001 of the Code, but that effort failed for want of service of the conditional order. A transcript of the judgment was filed in Gage county, and an execution issued thereon was delivered to Kyd, who was then sheriff of Gage county. He proceeded to Cortland and levied the execution on the cash tray…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurlburt v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Kane v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Royal Trust Co. of Chicago v. Exchange Bank of CortlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. O'HARASupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Williamson v. WilliamsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. DraytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. Norman v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Richards v. Estate of GilmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API