Legal Opinion
Woods v. Bourne Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1994No. 89 Civ. 3641 (RO)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are the statutory heirs of Harry Woods, the composer/lyrieist of “When the Red Robin Comes Bob-Bob-Bobbin’ .Along”. They apply for attorneys’ fees following this Court’s Opinion reported at 841 F.Supp. 118, familiarity with which is presumed. That opinion awarded them 1) the ASCAP — retained performance royalties and 2) income received by publisher Bourne from various editions of sheet music during the nineteen-year extension of copyright protection under the Copyright Act of 1976,17 U.S.C. § 304(c) (1988). While this motion for attorneys’ fees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Mills Music, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- M. Witmark & Sons v. Pastime Amusement Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1924
- Bourne Co. v. MPL Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Woods v. Bourne Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Woods v. Bourne Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995